A Reformulation of the Axiomatic Foundations of Relative Utilitarianism

نویسنده

  • Yan-Min Choo
چکیده

We consider the aggregation of individual agents’ von Neumann-Morgenstern’s utility functions into a societal von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function. We start from Harsanyi’s [7] axiomatization of utilitarianism, and ask under which conditions a social preference order that satisfies Harsanyi’s axiom uniquely reveals society’s marginal rates of substitution between the probabilities of any two agents’ most preferred alternatives. We then introduce three axioms for these revealed marginal rates of substitution. Our main result is that the only welfare function that satisfies these three axioms is the relative utilitarian welfare function. This welfare function, that was introduced in Dhillon [5] and Dhillon and Mertens [6], normalizes all agents’ utility functions so that the lowest utility value is 0 and the highest utility value is 1, and then adds up the utility functions. The three axioms that we introduce are closely related to axioms that Dhillon and Mertens used to provide foundations for relative utilitarianism, but our axioms allow a much simpler and more transparent derivation of the main result. [email protected] [email protected]

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Critical Analysis of Moral Utilitarianism in the View of John Stuart Mill From the Perspective of Allameh Ja’fari

Moral utilitarianism is one of the issues underlying utilitarianism among Western thinkers. At the forefront of this debate is John Stuart Mill, who found out the utilitarianism of morality after designing the classical liberalism in the realm of morality based on the philosophical basis of utilitarianism. To him, utilitarianism in life brings about most happiness for a person. The goal and pur...

متن کامل

A Reformulation of the Maxmin Expected Utility Model with Application to Agency Theory

Invoking the parametrized distribution formulation of agency theory, the paper develops axiomatic foundations of the principal’s and agent’s choice behaviors that are representable by the maximization of the minimum expected utility over actiondependent sets of priors. In the context of this model, the paper also discusses some implications of uncertainty aversion for the design of optimal ince...

متن کامل

Utilitarianism for infinite utility streams: A new welfare criterion and its axiomatic characterization

A definition of a utilitarian social welfare relation (SWR) for infinite utility streams is proposed. Such a relation is characterized in terms of the Pareto, Anonymity and Partial Unit Comparability Axioms. The merits of the utilitarian SWR, relative to the more restrictive SWR induced by the overtaking criterion, are examined. © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. JEL classification: D60;...

متن کامل

Measurement-Theoretic Foundations of Preference Aggregation Logic for Weighted Utilitarianism

Harsanyi [4, 5] develops expected utility theory of von Neumann and Morgenstern [21] to provide two formalizations of utilitarianism. Weymark [22, 23] refers to these results as Harsanyi’s Aggregation and Impartial Observer Theorems. In this paper, we are concerned only with Aggregation Theorem. Sen [6] argues that von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility theory is an ordinal theory and, theref...

متن کامل

New axiomatic characterizations of utilitarianism

JEL classification: C65, D63, D71, D81 Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 91B16

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015